Hachar's, Inc. v. Enterprise-Laredo Associates
Cases that cite this one
39 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Mines v. Metagenics, Inc. (District Court, District of Columbia 2023)
- Humble National Bank v. DCV, Inc. (Tex. App. 1996)
- Koch Oil Co. v. Wilber (Tex. App. 1995)
- West Anderson Plaza v. Feyznia (Tex. App. 1994)
- Frances Spanos Shelton v. Vernon Leuschner, and as Durable Power of Attorney for Katherine Leuschner, Robert Lee Spanos, Christopher Blake Spanos, and Kathryn Nicole Lawrie (Tex. App. 2025)
- Ali Mustafa and Ali Reza Lahijani v. Americo Energy Resources, LLC (Tex. App. 2022)
- Souther Equipment Sales, Inc. v. Ready Mix Solutions, LLC (Tex. App. 2018)
- Clear Lake Center, L.P. v. Garden Ridge, L.P. (Tex. App. 2013)
- David L. Smith Associates, L.L.P v. Stealth Detection ,Inc. (Tex. App. 2013)
- Estate of Wilbur Waldo Lynch (Tex. App. 2012)
- Geis v. Colina Del Rio, LP (Tex. App. 2011)
- George Geis D/B/A Rio Architects v. Colina Del Rio, LP (Tex. App. 2011)
- George Geis D/B/A Rio Architects v. Colina Del Rio, LP (Tex. App. 2011)
- Dana Corporation v. Microtherm, Inc. and David E. Seitz, Individually (Tex. App. 2010)
- Dana Corporation v. Microtherm, Inc. and David E. Seitz, Individually (Tex. App. 2010)
- Dana Corporation v. Microtherm, Inc. and David E. Seitz, Individually (Tex. App. 2009)
- Dana Corporation v. Microtherm, Inc. and David E. Seitz, Individually (Tex. App. 2009)
- Head v. U.S. Inspect DFW, Inc. (Tex. App. 2005)
- Sommers v. Concepcion (Tex. App. 2000)
- Conoco, Inc. v. Amarillo National Bank (Tex. App. 2000)
- Edward Jarzombek, Jr. v. Boone Maurer (Tex. App. 2000)
- Riddick v. Quail Harbor Condominium Ass'n (Tex. App. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR
Petitioner Hachar’s sued Enterprise-Laredo Associates and others (“Enterprise”) for breach of a lease agreement and related DTPA violations. In a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment for Hachar’s that Enterprise breached the lease and violated the DTPA. The court of appeals reformed the judgment to delete additional damages awarded under the DTPA and affirmed the reformed judgment as to damages for breach of the lease only. 839 S.W.2d 822. In denying petitioner’s application for writ of error, a majority of this court neither approves nor disapproves of the court of appeals’ discussion of the DTPA as applied to the facts of this case. The application for writ of error is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.