Omega OB/GYN Associates v. First Court of Appeals
Omega OB/GYN Associates v. First Court of Appeals
Opinion of the Court
In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of an order protecting mental health records from discovery. Both the trial court and the court of appeals rendered decisions prior to our writing in R.K v. Ramirez, 887 S.W.2d 836 (Tex. 1994). We believe the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of R.K. Accordingly, without addressing the merits of the petition and without prejudice to either party again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings, we conditionally grant the writ and direct the court of appeals to vacate its opinion and order, and the trial court to vacate its order of March 8, 1994. Tex. R.App.P. 122. The writ of mandamus will issue only in the unlikely event they do not do so.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- OMEGA OB/GYN ASSOCIATES and Omega OB/GYN Associates of South Arlington, P.A., Relators v. The FIRST COURT OF APPEALS, and the Honorable Eugene Chambers, Judge of the 215th District Court, Harris County
- Status
- Published