Texas Disposal Systems, Inc. v. Perez
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- City of Justin v. Town of Northlake (Tex. App. 2018)
- Franlink, Inc D/B/A Link Staffing Services v. GJMS Unlimited, Inc., Gloria M. Salazar and Jaime Lee Salazar (Tex. App. 2013)
- Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. Fielding (Tex. 2009)
- Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc. (Tex. App. 2003)
- BioTE Medical, LLC v. John Carrozzella, MD, JCMD Medical Services, Inc., Dan Deneui, and Terri Deneui (Tex. App. 2023)
- Sloan v. Law Office of Oscar C. Gonzalez, Inc. (Tex. 2016)
- Alliantgroup, L.P. v. Feingold (District Court, S.D. Texas 2011)
- Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. Cammarata (District Court, S.D. Texas 2010)
- In re SN (Tex. App. 2008)
- in the Interest of S.N., a Child (Tex. App. 2008)
- in the Interest of A.C.B., O.B.B., O.C.B. and O.D.B., Children (Tex. App. 2006)
- West v. Robinson (Tex. 2005)
- Royce B. West, Julia L. S. Gooden, A/K/A Julia L. S. Gooden-Wood, and Robinson West & Gooden, P.C. v. Malcom S. Robinson (Tex. 2005)
- Perez v. Texas Disposal Systems, Inc. (Tex. App. 2003)
- REPUBLIC UNDERWRITERS INS. v. Mex-Tex, Inc. (Tex. App. 2003)
- Albert Perez, Jose Maldonado, and Raul Gutierrez v. Texas Disposal Systems, Inc. (Tex. App. 2003)
- Republic Insurance Company v. Mex-Tex, Inc. (Tex. App. 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Texas Disposal Systems, Inc. (TDS) sued its former employees, Albert Perez, Jose Maldonado, and Raul Gutierrez, for violating covenants not to compete contained in their employment contracts.
The court of appeals is obligated to hand down a written opinion that “addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal.” Tex.R.App. P. 47.1; see Office of Pub. Util. Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm’n, 878 S.W.2d 598, 599-600 (Tex. 1994). Because the court of appeals did not consider the alternative basis that TDS asserted to support the attorney’s fees award, we remand the case to the court of appeals to consider this point. Accordingly, without hearing oral argument, Tex.R.App. P. 59.1, we grant TDS’s petition for review, reverse the court of appeals’ judgment, and remand the case to the court of appeals for further consideration in accordance with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.