In the Interest of N.K.
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Jonathan Timothy Noyes v. the State of Texas for the Protection of Samantha Jo Voges (Tex. 2026)
- In re JC (Tex. App. 2003)
- In the Interest of J.C., G.C., I.C., and T.C., Children (Tex. App. 2003)
- In re NK (Tex. 2002)
- Bobby Ray Foreman v. State (Tex. App. 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this case, the trial court terminated the parent-child relationship between Casey K. and her children N.K. and D.T.K. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision. 54 S.W.3d 499, 506. In doing so, the court of appeals reviewed the evidence under the traditional factual sufficiency standard, holding that the court would “sustain a factual sufficiency challenge only if we conclude that the finding is so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust.” Id. at 504. Our decision today in In re C.H., 89 S.W.3d 17, (Tex. 2002), rejects that approach. Accordingly, without hearing oral argument, we grant the petition for review without reference to the merits, vacate the court of appeals’ judgment, and remand this case to that court for further proceedings. See Tex.R.App. P. 59.1, 60.2(f).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.