In the Interest of L.S.R
Cases that cite this one
20 later published cases cite this decision.
- In THE INTEREST OF Z.N., a CHILD v. the State of Texas (Tex. 2020)
- in the Interest of M.A.S. and K.D.S., Minor Children (Tex. App. 2016)
- in the Interest of C. T. and K. T., Minor Children (Tex. App. 2012)
- in the Interest of C.A.J., a Child (Tex. App. 2015)
- in the Interest of G.M.G., a Child (Tex. App. 2014)
- in the Interest of F.G.M., a Child (Tex. App. 2014)
- in the Interest of M.R.L. a Child (Tex. App. 2013)
- R. F. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Tex. App. 2012)
- R. F. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Tex. App. 2012)
- In the Interest of O.S., a Child v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2024)
- In the Interest of L.M. v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2023)
- in the Interest of D.D.-G.P., a Child (Tex. App. 2019)
- in the Interest of D.D.-G.P., a Child (Tex. App. 2019)
- in the Interest of Z. N., a Child (Tex. App. 2019)
- in the Interest of Z.W., a Child (Tex. App. 2018)
- in the Interest of K.T., a Child (Tex. App. 2015)
- in the Interest of N.M., a Child (Tex. App. 2014)
- Albert Medellin v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Tex. App. 2012)
- Albert Medellin v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Tex. App. 2012)
- K.D.G. and L.L.G. v. Department of Family and Protective Services (Tex. App. 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
J.R. and L.R. appeal a judgment terminating their parental rights to their daughter, L.S.R. Section 161.001(l)(L)(iv) of the Texas Family Code provides for termination if a parent has been convicted or placed on community supervision, including deferred adjudication community supervision, “for being criminally responsible for the death or serious injury of a child” under various Penal Code sections, including a conviction for indecency with a child under Section 21.11 of the Penal Code. Tex. FaM.Code § 161.001 (1)(L)(iv). The State presented evidence at trial showing that J.R. had received deferred adjudication for the offense of indecency with a child, an offense J.R. committed against his four-year-old cousin when he was sixteen. The court of appeals held that there was no evidence to support termination under Section 161.001(l)(L)(iv) because there had been “no showing that J.R.’s cousin suffered death or serious injury as a result of his conduct.” 60 S.W.3d 376, 378. The court of appeals deleted this ground for termination from the judgment, but otherwise affirmed the judgment against J.R. Id. at 381.
We deny the petitions for review, but disavow any suggestion that molestation of a four-year-old, or indecency with a child, generally, does not cause serious injury.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.