McMahon Contracting, L.P. v. City of Carrollton
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- McMahon Contracting, L.P. v. City of Carrollton (Tex. App. 2009)
- City of Dallas v. Albert (Tex. 2011)
- City of Corinth v. NUROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. (Tex. App. 2009)
- Clear Lake City Water Authority v. MCR Corporation (Tex. App. 2010)
- the City of Corinth, Texas v. Nurock Development, Inc., Nurock Corporation, NDG-Tower Ridge 1, LLC and Tower Ridge Corinth 1, Ltd. (Tex. App. 2009)
- the City of Corinth, Texas v. Nurock Development, Inc., Nurock Corporation, NDG-Tower Ridge 1, LLC and Tower Ridge Corinth 1, Ltd. (Tex. App. 2009)
- the City of Corinth, Texas v. Nurock Development, Inc., Nurock Corporation, NDG-Tower Ridge 1, LLC and Tower Ridge Corinth 1, Ltd. (Tex. App. 2009)
- Clear Lake City Water Auth. v. FRIENDSWOOD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD. (Tex. App. 2008)
- Clear Lake City Water Authority v. Friendswood Development Company, Ltd. (Tex. App. 2008)
- City of Dallas v. Martin (Tex. App. 2007)
- City of Dallas v. Albert (Tex. App. 2007)
- City of Houston v. Swinerton Builders, Inc. (Tex. App. 2007)
- the City of Houston v. Swinerton Builders, Inc. (Tex. App. 2007)
- Tooke v. City of Mexia (Tex. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
McMahon Contracting, L.P. sued the City of Carrollton for breach of contract to perform street repairs and for quantum meruit. The trial court overruled the City’s plea to the jurisdiction based on immunity from suit, and the City took an interlocutory appeal. The court of appeals reversed and dismissed the case, holding that section 51.075 of the Local Government Code does not waive a city’s immunity from suit. 134 S.W.3d 925, 926-928 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004). For the reasons explained today in Tooke v. City of Mexia, 197 S.W.3d 325, 2006 WL 1792223 (Tex. 2006), we agree with the court of appeals that section 51.075 is not a waiver of immunity.
While this case has been pending on appeal, the Legislature has enacted sections 271.151-.160 of the Local Government Code, which waive immunity from suit for certain claims against local governmental entities, including municipalities. Sections 271.152-.154 “apply to a claim that arises under a contract executed before [September 1, 2005] ... if sovereign immunity has not been waived with respect to the claim” before that date. Act of May 23, 2005, 79th Leg., R.S., ch. 604, § 2, 2005 Tex. Gen. Laws 1548, 1549. McMahon should have the opportunity to argue in the trial court that the City’s immunity from suit is waived by these provisions.
Accordingly, we grant McMahon’s petition for review, and without hearing oral argument, TEX. R. APP. P. 59.1, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.