City of Sweetwater v. Waddell
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision. The 14 that cite it most often are listed here.
- City of Round Rock v. Whiteaker (Tex. App. 2007)
- Lowell v. City of Baytown (Tex. 2011)
- Lowell v. City of Baytown (Tex. App. 2007)
- City of Round Rock and Round Rock Fire Chief Larry Hodge v. Mark Whiteaker (Tex. App. 2007)
- City of Round Rock and Round Rock Fire Chief Larry Hodge v. Mark Whiteaker (Tex. App. 2007)
- City of Round Rock and Round Rock Fire Chief Larry Hodge v. Mark Whiteaker (Tex. App. 2007)
- City of Round Rock and Round Rock Fire Chief Larry Hodge v. Mark Whiteaker (Tex. App. 2007)
- Carr v. City of Fort Worth (Tex. App. 2008)
- Kris Carr v. City of Fort Worth, Texas, and Fire Chief Rudolph Jackson, Jr. (Tex. App. 2008)
- Kris Carr v. City of Fort Worth, Texas, and Fire Chief Rudolph Jackson, Jr. (Tex. App. 2008)
- Kris Carr v. City of Fort Worth, Texas, and Fire Chief Rudolph Jackson, Jr. (Tex. App. 2008)
- Ruben Mendiola, Jr., Juan C. Jalomo and Xavier E. Villela v. City of Laredo (Tex. App. 2007)
- DALLAS FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION v. City of Dallas (Tex. 2007)
- Mendiola v. City of Laredo (Tex. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Several firefighters and the Sweetwater Professional Fire Fighters Association sued the City of Sweetwater alleging that the City failed to promote firefighter Allan Waddell to the position of fire marshal as required by section 143.036 of the Texas Local Government Code, and failed to pay each firefighter the same base salary as required by section 143.041 of that code. The plaintiffs prayed for a declaration that the City’s actions were unlawful, an order that Waddell be promoted, and attorney fees and costs, under Tex. Civ. Prao. & Rem.Code § 37.001-011, and monetary damages. The City filed a plea to the jurisdiction, asserting that it was immune from suit and that the Association, and the individual firefighters other than Waddell, lacked standing to sue the City. The trial *81 court granted the plea, without stating the grounds for its ruling, and dismissed the case with prejudice. The court of appeals reversed and remanded, holding that the City’s immunity from suit was waived by a “sue and be sued” clause in its charter and that the plaintiffs all had standing to sue. 218 S.W.3d 93 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2005).
The court of appeals’ decision is inconsistent with our holding in Tooke v. City of Mexia, 197 S.W.3d 325 (Tex. 2006). On remand the trial court may consider, among other things, whether the City’s immunity from suit is waived by sections 271.151-.160 of the Local Government Code or other statutory provisions. See City of Irving v. Inform Constr., Inc., 201 S.W.3d 693, 694 (Tex. 2006). Accordingly, we grant the City’s petition for review and without hearing oral argument, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Tex.R.App. P. 59.1.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.