Thomas, Kenneth Dewayne
Thomas, Kenneth Dewayne
Opinion
AP-77,047 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/19/2015 3:11:10 PM JOHN TATUM 990 S. Sherman ATTORNEY AT LAW Accepted 6/19/2015 3:24:57 PM Richardson, Texas 75081 (972) 705-9200 ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
June 19, 2015
Court of Criminal Appeals June 22, 2015 c/o Abel Acosta Chief Deputy Clerk P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711
Re: Oral argument in Cause No. AP-77,047 Kenneth Thomas v. The State of Texas
Dear Mr. Acosta: Pursuant to Rule 71.3 Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I am advising this Honorable Court that I, on behalf of Appellant in the above referenced cause, am requesting oral argument on issues Nos. 31- 34, 47-48 and 50. T hese issues concern voir dire on intellectual disability, whether Briseno factors are constitutional, sufficiency of evidence of intellectual disability and whether the jury was properly charged on intellectual disability.
I believe oral argument would help present these issues in full context and help present a comparative analysis of the issues raised. Therefore, I respectfully request oral argument on these issues.
Sincerely,
/s/ John Tatum John Tatum JT:mt
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.