fUt. (Wat 0? DAUA5 Cvu*xrvf£Xfys- 29<S^ S^utoJW-L (WfcST •' PBDEi¥ED'lM A^b rnt Cwtror MVem-S Foe •. ZWe-r- «*w«n-r«raMttfflMai abbkai ^FfrFftltyi r faM*f Ufa. 6>tr-t3~ois*-t-6e. W »W U Htof criminal appe?! ; JUL 0?,'^'«3 • AbelAcosta.ClerK ; P&Tttuh 17* flwrr To Pp.\6zxa, <t#L X^o^^fT

: ^Tfrt£M£^r^J2£to2£;m6_0e^ _! j^Wd__^i.ftpt4./u65 Bs£ gtw^iuj: _5£ri^/^^___2w__T^te^^7^ra5C»^ ^W&^a/CL

ififee^&y—W£i5^_(^_:J^£_ .Rso_s.£ DzE$*jbQk.cC- ____ 3rj9^H4Ajr_. .©£lj!0i_ZL&5.£.

Q6JJh^3O—&0&±

£#<<^ ^cU y<M^^ &MJ&J& To igsT e>a *Smi( 3. tSoisr $pc*A feg^m^ J^&oM^^&^_£s&SjjU- G*/E.

£?A&o*jr Fop. (?&/Vem

fiemf^mL^£^iJ&^ Jkc__T%e^ge^ojUL_fMjL^

J^M£Kl$\_. _ ! !

Afe/3^ JA^nST Alo^ & ifrteitko- fr&Afc><*4AW UMrfp Rf). &ek ^ 0 a/, Ttvuvc,

j^^ia:Bs:_C^K^^^E_Si£^^s_ 3k&_:s^_:nt?~G£fcrrf^ g.ktt£ri£fi £tsJ£>_

„^p-^-~ -Qb^—-<__ i.KOLM) O.NK:

kWlAlAUT P^/frfrfftS THAT Hr<, -nh^L. Fhrsr £e>u*rvl. I .

PAftwrfc. t^A^rs U^r-rTc^u> Jr^^ecm^ /^SEST?^ GFCouu&l ,<latu

I A( ISM IM'OIMINC, <,-HOUND ONK:

ItEiMMir CameMM -m x^:r- 7^,r ^c C^^.i (..

Vtkb-A^VJ^o^- ft*QT <S>?C**xi -r^JL ^.XS CSM^y "fry? Tttfr. ^g»r

!K c \. i)| .£&c35. or v\t, LfsfoLtct r^e- (~Wc 7K#r i^tba /A&.

^.t/^LS tLP<L££UTflcTC&U fe? &1 cert Ati M&qafc

tt£'. fegjiLC XkiSuPPoer of PtrrTzotf fqc b&~ Th TH^ Hot4®£L &GLJL tS^OO«£- OF -th^ CWe.T~ Of Ctftg»-xJ7MAt fWg/frLS« J^Q^e.—^-VAJ Kfr/134 L^M^Kir &AebeK, ?fx-rf~GtS££- &-/k PtUS Tlfc

• &£oi«ub e^jz Y .

LSC&KtT &y QafajGi flrt^x .rxtf*3P&r.T- Lra.AL. Abtfrtf AUS6/os ulfrf/+J&J>

$iAek5uf$ CaSL [(Lttf#/*££b }de>rjz:L—^o-^r&- &M&S ag^jb&u _^e^iA£^fcut^^u^^l^Tif-0^jrr^s S&5U (W^^M^r tile, es^^rr <bf fatfZz^^iazui xh rt^^cMx To

QF gL\f&c*Lf\>fcmd£&> $fJLou& -iUAr UzS> bpFrUT£i^r f>Jtz,3&J^M±C£_B2L5hc>aQ>

*Tkk—CmAex£^-&*jOUF>J&(k—&^ \<fl?!> /a) W>£ rs 4 PfA&xJ\*&L£. PeM&f&r.iarnf ^^r( guar foa. zW^£^ aJ

®^J?zjcy&^5&U,-__&^_^^ 7&-TZ&L

fexfrauds, g^., tANigff^ St^TISC \Xokfcv !>OQ U&, k^fi.^C, (<H <ffi\ F . ^ fr?>^ $3£ (W,. QceY &**. frs/dcrb. l^ C fcrJLAgl US", NU S.Ex. \£3> OfflJ)j WirrEfr 95tfrrfS \T. lo utaUieif (^SS" \k& APP. \sp1-^ eeftfrtoi ; £feU lAJb, ttfl>. for. ^0, ^OSl R &* SSTh.C7 LbC &£ Qjizz- v> k(.i5j^ H<\fe ia_s- qwa. (j<we>V. -7#& bxsfezcr Guars faunzufy (kDfed^OE_r(yC-Sl^m^

.(^UJEflEft.AS ^Ub&vHaxr -rttof 0^ UJA6 Ah^^BUl 7& ^ly '&JTHE

PeoSt 'OtftrtCAiar-

-

•

S©F3 MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed April 3, 2015.

In The Court of appeals jftftl) Btetrtct of flfexa* at Ballas; No. 05-13-01507-CR

KEVIN LAMONT GARDEN, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-57354-S

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Stoddart, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck Kevin Lamont Garden appeals his conviction, following the adjudication of his guilt, for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. In a single issue, appellant contends the trial court's judgment should be modified to delete the fine. The State agrees the fine should be deleted from the judgment. We modify the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt and affirm as modified.

Appellant waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a firearm. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). The- trial court deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on seven years' community supervision, and assessed a $2,500 fine. The State later moved to adjudicate guilt, alleging appellant violated several conditions of his community supervision. Following a hearing at which appellant pleaded true to the allegations, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and assessed punishment at twelve years' imprisonment. The trial judge did not orally pronounce a fine. The trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt, however, includes a $2,500 fine.

When a variation between the oral pronouncement of the sentence and the written memorialization of the sentence exists, the oral pronouncement controls. See Coffey v. State, 979 S.W.2d 326, 329 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); see also McCoy v. State, 81 S.W.3d 917, 919 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2002, pet. ref d). We sustain appellant's sole issue. We modify the judgment adjudicating guilt to delete the fine. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529-30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. refd).

As modified, we affirm the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt.

/David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE

Do Not Publish Tex.R. App. P. 47

131507F.U05 Court of Appeals Jftftf) Btstrtct of Qfexa* at ©alias

JUDGMENT

KEVIN LAMONT GARDEN, Appellant Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-13-01507-CR V. F10-57354-S).

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee . Justices Lang and Stoddart participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt is MODIFIED as follows: The section entitled "Fine" is modified to show "None." As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt.

Judgment entered April 3, 2015.