Texas Supreme Court, 2015

Ellis, Eugene James

Ellis, Eugene James
Texas Supreme Court · Decided August 17, 2015

Ellis, Eugene James

Opinion

3/,55`<§/ ‘ HCF HE@EW HM fu eve 3217/723 E 111's, #7533511' COURTOFCF?MNALAPP~M \A// //1117)7 19 C/@mewts dn?t AUG 17 2515 9601 5 par 591 Amar1`11 o Texas 79107 9606 " 71 ` A@@M@@SF@,©/@Fk l111 1111 60115111'117101\1111 601/1117 101111 F'o/z 7115111)1157011 1)1v15_101\1 - Dl$ 7/1€ T OF 11AHR1S CO111\11`11111@)'11©1\1 ge §1% DN'E ' ` ~ ; ' . 1312 - §113€@@ Fgm@$ 511/5 ' CM, /\/O_ 1 55 251 ,

199 fit/over Ca$€ /\10. 94 20 §425 ` 1$, 1 _ figzr¢s_§@_n_tg_ E)< 131sz EueENE 111/1155 Ems 1 P£T111o1\1 FOB 11 me of~ mmm h Q[$ZWCZ` §1‘;0[77:# ['&g[/es /?ogc_;‘m‘lzal _QLLQ_N££BAAL'[Q (:Q“zzf_§¢[kr]g ng;[es Qacar/sse I 5M.;1;1;11£111z 1215 1111'[11" ;5'”" l Petnfioner fué/ene frames 151/15 pro se #755355; was tried 177 1119 357 jad/e/'a'/ D/sl`r/'cl‘ [0111"2‘ of Ha)’r/s [0117)1/3 077 ME}%L_LY_CI_Q_ 13 07” a charge of 5e1<11a/a55au1t 111/uch resulted /77 a /)11773j11r_1/ Fez“itmne'r was 511175egue711`1g imprvper/j reind)cl‘ed 177 ?/7112L 1112 77211//771101777€772‘ 17011) 7”€11<1 ravafed ~"¢m improper e77/71171ce771e712L f 17 117€ refria/, petitmner was 7%1177¢/5111'/2‘5 077 MH¢U&SaWJ sevier/ied 10 _11£¢;177 z*/7e Texas De/Qarz`~ 777€771.‘ 01 (r/'m/'na/ ]hsz`ic@ 1775151 fut/omc/ D)'v)s)o'n Pacg€ 1 o?C 5 Tl d/§Togz Q/; ~U,;» QA§E Pez“it/'o;zer was charged wit/v a crim|e Z‘/)a[ a//ejeq'/j occurred on or aéou?.‘ fee S’Q' day of jan.,. /993 in the city of /'/ousz‘@w, /'w Hzm’/'S C'oaml‘j» PeT/'Z/'om=r was }n¢//'cte</ 077 or ahead Z/ze 75"’1’01‘“ jan 7995 avc/ /ms been /'71 ,DV/sow 5/')7ce on Z‘})/s eharje, //e now reside§ af t/ze f/eme)vf§ Z/m'z° at /7'777¢17'/'//0 7e;xas /)Z' i/?e time of fha Z‘r/'a/, the Heo.secaz‘or was C/mr/e: /?ose;;z‘/$a/, z‘/)e twa/judge was Lm€s B‘arf anal the counl:g c/er/< [/MT/€$ Bacar/sse 771/§ peizZ/'o)v /s c//'reciec/ § W/Ic)ever'/s m Z‘/)e ahp/dal capac/'-Z:q now m _@_UO__\AM_`\BEANIO_ 77))5 /'5 f/)e proper procedure Z`a chall/enje Z“/)e jurisdiction 076 a prosecuic)r, a]u¢/je ora c/er/f 7Z'ej cam?oz‘ be a#ac/<e`a/ cO//al`era//j, LUZ` 77a/sf be attacked m a QHO Warmm“o procedure See gai/Qomk vs _S’tate af 7éxas, 03- -% 003//3 cv (e 20 97),. 942 sw 2d 574, 994 w.zd 3)4, IIZ_ABG.MM.E_NI '/77€ Um'z‘e.c/ 51¢‘[€.5 &nst/'Z‘a`('/z>n regu)res féaz‘ a// elected 07' appointed alc/F/'cI/z)s af Z‘/?€ pub/ic Zrc/sf, £efere z‘a/</')y Z“/ve oat/1 of office s£al/ swem'm" az%'rm z'/mt Z‘})\ej have nat pajed 07 presumed amy mow/es 07' Z/v/'/)§s of m/ue pfdm/$ed emp/oymenf ar Wpoiwz"menf as pub} /c off/c/a/s m 07"0/€'/ to secure Val‘es, 7Ze 4772‘/ ér/ber_t/ oat/7 771qu [72 7[//ec) will/1 Z`/ze gearel‘afy of jz‘az‘e éefore swear/bg in or m%'/mmg z‘o z‘/7e oaf/v of off/ce W?e erc/a/ owners Z‘o 71;1/2‘)7)[¢)//_)/ mecqu />/'5 07’ /’791” duties fo /)7”€» 5€;”1/6, protect anc/ de?pe)m/ the @st/tat¢om of z‘/ze [/m`z‘ec} Stalfez amf f/Ie Staz‘e m w/)/'c/) z‘/)ej operate fee 7ex fonsi /»¥¢'2‘, m §1 7;/€ Omcia/s mu>'Z'L f/€ documents fe/az‘eJ to ajhér fea/end <§¢ Sfate adi/25 .Pag€ 2 of 5 as whal‘ever the form 111 which fha Goreroweoz‘ 7€1111:1‘1'0113 Ao_qooe enter/115 info an cyreemen£ with thai Goverrrmer)z‘ Z‘o/<es Z‘he risk of having accuro'[e/g ascertained Zhai he who purporl°s fo act 1007 Z`h€ Goverwmenl‘ sZ‘aj w/Z‘h/r) the houndr/es of h/s or her authorl'j.f 7he scope on‘he auZ‘hor/§y 1111152‘ he exp//ed’j deJOmed hu congress or he /17171Z‘ed he de/ejal‘ed /egi$/a¢io?? proper/j exercvsed through the 1’¢1/@ mak/154 power gee C'rop los vs Merrz// 532 L/ 5 320 (1911’1) 7h¢/5 ha 1/1'11 /e.//ec/ z‘o 7(11/11// Zhe eoosz‘/'tutlom preregumz‘s of hold/113 offzce, Z`he acf/ops of Zhe 01(1£1€1¢2/ are vold. Ez;Leio_ supra, pg .2 of§ ,' L_Qz)e.§z;%_de$_?f/_€S_ML_\&_AEL 945 s w.zd 3311, 537 (7')< App f/}ero 19912) 01’15111¢/ proceed/113 fa//ure to take the oath of mcfwe renders any judicial act Vv/(/ The enacZ‘/'og afa sl‘afute 1'£15 presumed that 1.)€0111p/1cmee w/?,‘h the Consl‘il‘utmn of Z`he $Z‘ate and Z‘he L/n/Z‘ed SZuTes 15 an‘ended,' 2) the 011/g means ofcha//e1131'11g judges au?hor/“z‘y is through a Quo Warrao?“o act/071 111 wh/ch the sl‘o.z‘e /s the 111despe1151h/e pariy, ;:ewis gs QZQ/€€ Sw.atd 392 395 [7'5< App Da//os 191?2),' 0r1j/71a/ proceeding £LLe_Z'o supra 1\/,4, ,p£ ,5 of§ / 3) f/ected judges must ta/<e a new oath wnfh each hew term Pr/'ez‘o supra N‘/ pg 5 of 6'/" see er 11 Sc. §/153 judges must Z‘a/<e oaz‘h of office 111 this ease ifeiiher the prosecuZ"o/Y judge 01” courZ‘ e/erh cannol` provide the orig 1'11¢1/ dod every suhse~ oue))z‘ oath of ahp/ce for each new term 771€ oath of oFFme 15 regwred h_g the C`ohsz‘/"¢ut/ow and Z‘heiease musz‘ he d/s?m'ssed/ 76 they eam)oi' produce fhe reemer documeoB Z`o act us represeoz‘a[ 1ve$ of z‘he Goveromenz‘, ds 're?u/'red hg /aw, Z`he eourZ` muse 1_ssue an Orc/er dismiss/1151 the judgment with prejudwe.

Pag@ 5 Of 5 Jz_eaaeeuse)_a Quo Warraht'o is the proper procedure for attaching a j'uoé¢]r))eht ` when the projecutor judge ami court clerk 111 the stated case cio mt have their credentials as required hy the Cohstitatioh ami statutes z“o operate 1'11 their off/'ciai functiow for the Government, ff any of them cio not have the reiuireoi credentia/s, then a// actions 1'11 this case must he elec/aired voio(, AB 11\111'10, _ _ Quo Wurranto is a prerogative writ which means ohe does not have to prove anythinda, 011/y maheu the accusation The burden of /)r<_)o)c how Shitts~ to the Opposinj§part_q, EgAzeg 5"`05:_ 551ng /:07’ r€a50775 $tateoi here/ul supported h_y iaw, petzt)o??€f herehy ` moves the court to dec/are the act/iam of the prosecutor, judge ami Cou‘rt C/Grif i71 V/'O/at'ion 076 the /aw>’ hand St'a“£u‘ile$ of the dwi'i'eci $Z`a'[e_s" aho' issue a writ of Quo Warran?`o dee/arinj their actions voio' ami dec/are the °convictiorz of the petitioner 1111// ami VOici. 1413 11\/1"T10

i

huge 14 ht" 5 \ i /\`, . n '" CERT{F)CATE OF SERVICE.

I fugene games i;'iiis,"ik "F7533551P do here/nj Certi@ that a true anei Correct copy of the ahov€ petition was sent to /1’arr1s C°oum‘j District C/er/< anal to the Courtot` Cr)mma/Ap/oea/s 7he 7%1*9501113 pe tit/on was served hj p/acz??ae the same 111 the tin/ted States ma/`/, postage prepa/et 011 this thth;/’ c/aj of August /.,ZDJ§ Eug€n€ imes Eiii$, petitioner INMAT/:’s D£ECLARA T1o1\1 I Eujehe james t'///`s ”"153359, 11111 the petitioner ami am present/j mcarcerated 111 the i/\/////am /9 firemeth U111t c/ec/are underpena/tj of perjury that accord/113 to 111_¢/ heilef the facts stated 111 the ahove petit/011 are true aho/ correct Execute¢i and sgueo’ 011 Augu;t 13 j ,201_5 less gas Eu;ene ]Zmes E/iis Fetitio'ner l .Pag€ 5 of 5 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.