Iran Jay Hawkins v. State
Iran Jay Hawkins v. State
Opinion
/fayuxr zf/r z*-'s- tow v / ^ m! 10-11-00075-CR AUG 26 2015 COURT OF/gg^S 7^ 6/^6/sMY- 7V ./toy/3, 20/Sr
r4$ ZT/y&i7fau&!> /a/ My jQ&&/a/s /j&m?st %/itib /s AJ£^4y»&fc& <&?rc&z && ^w //M/e^p/^e. j0/e£S£MF, £/2Z£S) &WT&&D Wf77fcU7- OO^S&^T 7® /& SO. 7%m£ Cm/S&fT /jfu/ /W?/4ES SUCtf &S772U A SBZ0W~£&p2E& /&/GAy /foftto^/^TTfcrMW/=# />/b A - ,~^~„^, w ^,«^ —„, ,,*^~ v.^tr,, ~r,^, /fy?^ 4 <%A/t//b AJ02 //y>//&>. /V/es. 6(M*7&v*=fc 77¥&//yamw/c& <t?/^ 77/rs /)ee&0&& &H/S£ /f//?MV/r tV&?//s /fewO @V Tfifc t/iSBW &&£: TZfe 7&X>
^ZA/£>/E£Z>f 776S /fi?S g£E7lS ,faj @\fyO/A/t /Msr /)£p&)l£ M& €>/^/»y /)U& wfe7 J- MgoE you Se/Af 7ff/s /m/m tg A (Oa/ 7//B mmi/&w/)r (/V/tf7&V€&) JT a///dv/e&J e&w&s &^y>s)c/mm//& sz/3sz&£es wom/feEr/tov<E/8y /^Aj/<^(&u)//U/)/cA&iy As Me&/&i &/_&fir%r (&/&£yw/iy/#A/X &////&/&)?£&£ za. 2effi oo/a^/^a/ (uv/ezs&t/rf&y /$} 2&// wz//w/<w &mpJs _Mt/&> ?f) /&//htv Acetj/y?7i smm&8£& &u//r/& /M//?y?/A#? /^c&?meymr/z Am?/£%L ^/srypz. J5? sv//i&a/jf awav^ £Xtff(?&2/Z&> C/&/T7S. Ak/ /^/Z/bfATfr/ /?/r&e>V&W/>7&/>fr/ /)0C(//??6W3r•, /L/fift/AE: 7/fer <&W/>;/UW /A//>/C7W&tfr WJE7Z6T &) tuts c//fa<?ez> /p/e /^//o^mis AMD /¥?&/!&> /tea// stytfy &o) ytsm?. jTAAc/a- Uo/x\m?*f^& />/& a?*/a) // td yMs jAO 7%&r &pQ&&7?77&(/r CU/rAttE: y&CA^/&/^ y^gAAa^> '^?ZV7D<jy /// W^ im/^ (OP /&€&/&€ S&&&^//<^ATA)^ f/J&/££7 7£5?7/?~€D 0V A^ A&M//T W, /Vs /m/s 61%S S^A '/<//2 A&MO VF&> tTZfr Ms /TAA#/?ys tcm& ///oAZfivs. /^ ygA^cyi) £ao?j^AF7^> AfypAwmTv /t&ejt/yey am&z 0m, Sy' /Ws^sOy)£A?swJ/0v 7D /A/rfa^&l&Az jiuemz: /U&v, /<&&> /a/ avaaj/) -JeAk/J&v OxAAfTy /
wo/ua?tfe£ri*&£ £y (/aiAiy^AJ i&}s //&jb^ /s^&^/fr /mump ^ f&zw/hfrf ss, 20// 7/y/i/m/&at tt/b^b <&-yc/ASf/ao -7^7/yo/y* M/zs: uJA/t&tf&z-/js eJ&wfy sy&o t&um/o/j (UmM/r/Gb AU /Mju/?/b/$ sfez;,, AUyLfijxs0=v//y w/7^oM/Af MiiPALilcmmm^^ _ \Zo/me^f^
1 substances or exhibits?
2 A. They would receive the evidence. They would generate a unique laboratory case number assigned,to that case that allows us to track that evidence while it's in our position -- possession. They would make a note of the condition of the evidence when they received it. -Then they would file the evidence in the vault until which time we would retrieve it for analysis.
9 Q. Okay. Do your records reflect who handled the drugs after Ms. Posey?
11 A. The analysis was initially done by Kay Davis.
12 Q. Who is Kay Davis?
13 A. She was formally.an employee of our laboratory.
14 She had retired last year.
15 Q. Okay. So she no longer works for the Department of Public Safety, correct?.
17 A. Yes, sir, 18 Q. Okay. And in looking at the exhibit, can you actually tell if Kay Davis handled that, both exhibits actually?
21 A.- Yes, I do see her initials on State's Exhibit Number 2 and State's Exhibit Number 1.
23 Q. Okay. Can you tell if those exhibits were ever picked up again after Kay'Davis did her analysis? , 25 A. Yes.; The evidence was returned on December 17 of
LUANN M. GILL, CSR, RPR *** 24 9TH OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER \Jb/tw&¥(>
1 2008 to a Brent Dickey.
2 Q. Okay. Do your records reflect who Brent Dickey was working for?
4 A. The S.T.O.P. Special Crimes Unit.
5 Q. Okay. And was the exhibit ever again received by the Texas Department of Public Safety Crime Lab in u Garland?
8 A. Yes, it was received more recently, on January 13 of this year.
10 Q. Okay. Do your records reflect who dropped it off?
12 A. By Marshall Whitlock.
13 Q. Okay. Does it say where or who Marshall Whitlock worked for?
15 A. The S.T.O.P. Special Crimes Unit.
16 Q. All right. Who actually received the exhibit from Marshall Whitlock?
18 A. Again, it was received by Linda Posey, same person.
20 Q. Linda Posey again?
21 A. Yes, sir.
22 Q. Was she fulfilling her same duties as she was back in 2008?
24 A. That's correct.
25 Q. All right. And what happened next with the
TiTTANN M. GTT.T, . P.QR T?PT? *** OAQTU n w r m 7\ T r'rMT'DT' nmnnnrm-m s„*~am}>
Y. ^
r INDICTMENT 1&QPY—' Bond Recommendation $.
No, _£imi2- IRAN JAY HAWKINS The Stateof Texas V. DEUVEEY Of ACONTROtLBD SUBSTANCE IBSSTHAH OK.GKAM Charge: Count 1- DEUVEKVO.ACONTROUEDSUBSTANCE1TO.GRAMS Count 1 - (ENHANCED)
IN THE NAME AND BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: , r i. en,*- nf Texas dulv selected, impaneled, sworn, upon Aeir oatiu presentin and to said Court atSald termthat IRAN JAY HAWKINS
in the County and State aforesaid, did then and there: ™t*t tp AMcniER. TO TESSIE BATES, ACONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, ORDILUTANTS,
AWTOSAIDCOURTTHATIKANIAYHAW^S^NUKAOU ^ ^ DIDTHEN AND THEES
INCLUDING ANY ADULTERANTS OR DILUTANTS, ^r^»*WAnPAPH-ANDrriSFURTHERFRESENTEDINANDTOSAIDCOURT FEU
INTENT TO DELIVER,
Against the peace and dignity ofthe State.
Foreman of the GrandJury
•« !""53 >- /1 X •— o* / -a- 1 LEO 1 HI G -> 5 ^l^t —•» Q \^ S3 **• / CD r^> ^ ^ til *
* N
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.