@§tSSS'QG

n:. Alexmvw vale, Jr.

Hnak¥el$griahst bhrkvl Stik§ 3060 FM 3514 RECE|\/ED 'N BHmuw RWB CCUPT 77705-’7633 OF CR'M'NA“- APPEALS November 30th, 2015 DE@ @7 2@?]5 The Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk Texas Court of Criminal Appeals P.o. Box 12308 Ab@l Acosta, mem

Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-2308

Ref. Cause No.; WR-65,555-20; Ex parte Alex Melvin Wade, Jr. (Letter making correction of filing)

Dear Mr. Acosta: -

Enclosed please find a corrected page 4 of "Applicant's proposed findings of fact, Conclusions of law and Order and page five (5) Applicant Alex Melvin Wade, Jr.,'s Strenuously object in this his Response to State's Original Answer November 5th 2015." Applicant filing contain errors that may affect the decision of the Court and Applicant request the same be inserted and or made

to the attention of the court upon submission of the corrected pages 4 &5.

l have by copy of this letter forwarded to the Office of Chris Daniel, Clerk of Harris County, Texas District Courts copies of the same enclosed documents to be made filed and forwarded to this Court where the record, as incomplete as it is will be amended showing the correction made herein. l have also sent a copy of this letter to the Office of the Honorable Devon Anderson, District Attorney, Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin Street, 6th Fl., Houston, Texas 77002.

Thank you very kindly for your attention in the handling of this matter.

I hope soj~ gzworable action is taken in the request made herein.

y vai§€§:xqqr;;:,r:,eely

Lf_ /; L

€nC .

in_light of newmevidence, "it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have found him Applicant guilty beyond a reasoanble doubt." See, Bell v. Housee126 S. Ct. 2064, 2076-77(2003)

This Court has considered the rationale of McQuiggin v. Perkins,, 133 S.Ct.1924(2013), Applicant' s evidence, new discovered and relevant evidence attached to pleading filed by applicant in the clerk' s office, possess a strong showing of "actual innocence." Applicant applications contain sub- Stantive claims in support of the actual innocence, one in specific, ineffective assistance of trial counsel and prosec utional misconduct.

RECOMMENDATION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

Applicant's filing attached with evidence supporting his claims and this Court is of the opinion and it recommend the Court of Criminal Appeals issue its Onkr for an evidentiary hearing on applicant unresolved claims as acknowledge by the Stat -e '5~ Motion Designating lssue filed by the Office of Devon AnderSOn v District ASttorney for Harris County, Texas, via, Andrew Smith, Assistant District Attorney filed on March 11th, 2014 some 19 months ago. See, Ex P_a__rte Elizondo2 947 34 2d 202-., 211 (Tex. Crim. App 1996)

_ v 'ORDER

THE CLERK lS QRDER to prepare an amended transcipt of all papers filed in cause number 1222385- D and transmit same to the Court of Appeals as provided by Tex. Code Crm .Proc. Ann. art ]1- 07(West 2013) The amended transcipt shall d include certified copies of the following documents;

1. The State' s Motion Requesting Designation of issue and a filed

stamped filing signed by this Court;

2. Appli cant' s filing labeled as Exhibits in the Clerk's Record online _4_

-1. AHJ]_i'.cantAlex\Vlel\/inwade, Jr.',smemnrardunbriefonuin:esoledissuewhed'm:the Applicant receivedineffectiveassistaiveofcamseliniiieprimarycase. filedon

or abaitMaylSth, 2015 2. ApplicantAJexMelvinvbde, Jr., PetitionaidA;plicationforReleaseonPersoral

Recogrwaive Borrl ard/or Setti'i'g of Resonable Surety Bai_l perdi_rg fiia]_ity of State' s Writ of Habeas Corp-is. Certificate of Sewice dates 06/18/15 ,

3. Ag)]_i_cantAl@<MelvinWade, Jr. , 'sAmeidedMernrarduninSqurtof daUnrasolved y claim ofi ineffective assistaive of coursel aid sufficiervy of line evideive in the primary case, with Jury instrcvtim attached CR-(X)122-(X)124 aid JLn'.y' s rote CR-(XI132

4 Agolmtbbmdmhiefw&@ortofgrmtoftabeaswrpsbailpadiigfda]iw ofreviewlytleCairtofCrimiralAHJeals.

5.App]_icant'smainrard1min stportof unresolved issLa#five(S), vhether the State a]lmedperjriiede/ideiveaidfalsetestimimyinttapjmarycase. Datedl\’archZOthl) 2014

6 AHJHcait'sthraideriefregardiig&gpressimofimpea‘hrmtevidee byprosecu- tim autl'vrities tl'at was favorable to ag)]_icant. Certificate Lmdated

7. App]_i.cant'sAlexI‘/lelvinl/Jade,.,_lr mamraidunlriefmmn:asolvedisslevl')etherd'ie statemmiittedaBradyviolatiminfl'aprimarycase. Biesepleadii‘grefera:vethe C]e;k'sRecordinsi@ortoflhearngant. DatedApri_l$rd, 2014.

Applicant' S list go on aid on, bit the St`ate fails to acknowledge the above filing n that should and must~be presented to the Court of Criminal Appeals in the Writ Application review. To not prepare a correct habeas`record for presenta- tion to the Court of Appeals would be nothiig_ less than deny him his due .pro-

cess of law.

LEGAL ARGUMENT ON.'ISSUE OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE THAT ENTITLE HIM 'IO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON THE.ClAIM OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE SUPPORTED

in : light of McQuiggin v. Pe'ri<ins, -133 s.ct. 1924(2013)(¢iting w v_. D_e_l£,_ 513'U.S. 298(1995) provide the foundation that an applicant must meet to support his actual innocence claim. Applicant allegation has hurdled 4 g Pir£§_ Ri`chardsog '_,` 70 s.w3d 865, 870(Tex.crim. App. 2002); see aiso`g w _A;dag, 768 S.W.2d 281(Tex.' Criminal App. 1988), Applicant's evidence presented _in the writ filing of Applicant, State's knowingly used false evidence and the State suppressed evidence favorable, which irs exculpatory and impeachment

evidence. The suppressed evidence, the state knew existed andaa]la»l§l it to

go uncorrected .