Lewis, Cedrick Bernard
Lewis, Cedrick Bernard
Opinion
PD-1115-15 0& 6fa\-(V*u*ep^ ftt-V^^
f'U<V yw
CeO<mcK LfvftS
RECEIVED „„ -(NO i r> n -? U09 COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS
b^ &W £ftL ^tA Vnt 1W ^Ald aL CtsVfSxcT C£>uA"T AbelAcosia.Cleri.
•iLO.13
4a*b 6aps tV • e^^Mrri "Ta&Le b£ C<*>1k*Ts p^ ^6d
9x\ftYk^ vV, vv ,%VV*>NS V^ VVS IV»t 13
^W UsT J QlaTUc^xTxES Qpffc vW.
W. S-T^s^ W. O*. S^ ,MSfc (lex. Qs. P$. 111$ 11 sTftTuT^s*. ?a1e ^.
^HftS^^ftLCeAtf Sec.~Wafc.64x xvx x. xx » • . mIO
t^i~i. Vtffe vJfi.u
.?, ^.VWE 'cftPxAxice s ^u'ftisV WRi>W.i"U Q 1&CAS Rules rf^WW£-?WU»xft%.IWt-^*<«fe
<«*ftl9«&<?«*A% Cartel'. CAbui 0. 1^-VftLL n fcntftsTLAd.vS'TReelx^iil-te.^
^bcsxwvxIe". C<k~ft TJa-aauW /(x\lflLS"TftTEbC6a»4'=,£V. ^u . n . J2b.\ I nbLVEp
iWh»^.! (fl^ <7AV Woo ^cs^ik; Clo^ 103- 7919
?PtS3iMiU (TV'S Til- 44TM
^EleW^f. fte") "13.^-7^6 M>i^*W"~Su<^M6^ WiUfoi .*.£***- £a<vibto-
•3.P we ST<\tavx.fc.KfT tJ TWe Case.,. WR eMwfT vJfcS \vxA\ckA UCft^t vWb>«- 7>lWxoftk Wxt *?&*&* sS
\$M, f\\W^ Vk VlMt- &ccia(M&2 c^ CW^s. Vix a<M~V« xo fWkt&ti
io.|h^ \t,»oi4 4W Cau^ x£i<^. 1?^ 4& A-3v*f.ffr- -Su*.? £m^A ^t\\m\^'M^\\i ten i^aluA^ cVxeR^tei^
J W^VA <W*W U*^* xA^oC^W^
Q>.h%
Reference
- Status
- Published