Texas Supreme Court, 2015

Smith, David

Smith, David
Texas Supreme Court · Decided December 30, 2015

Smith, David

Opinion

* * PD-1690-15 RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS hio DEC 28 2015 JLN THE (LOudT OF CtlhMML RPPlsflLS Abel Acosta, Clerk flVSTlhi) TEXA5 FlLtD \H Davjd smith COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS V. Abel Acosta, Clerk THE 5Jf\-T£ OF Ttf</»5

From RpftoAl A/o. Q2-/sr-ooDS"3-CK Ttifrl tki)5£ NO i j l3^3U>i»0 D

f\RST MoTlQAf foft gXTFA/5/0A| of TIME TO PILE Petition for biscneTioM^Ry review 7D TWe HoHoRft&iB. ^t/o&es of thf coukt of CRim^iM APPEALS ) £o(W$ roouJ} D4W0 3MJTH, PM\*#*RI AtU fi\<S fU'S y^\o* f0*~ fijJ etMFM of s',^ CUt>) dtp )m UU iv -p;k Afyjfa,, fa frscArioMY Rei/W. Tm So/pod offils moi'i0Ml Aff»>ll#rf shau^s +k<c G>o/fr M-faf**'** *t •J0 *

J.

Tht fkti+ioNm uufiS <Souv»'cfe<j \ri -fa, 3 b)SWid Count of "J^^ff Cowhj ~T<a&s> ofH* offatsi o$ Possissiorf ofA&»iT*>iiGt Sv&sTA/Jce of four 6^M3 or Mone fiuTless TMMZ<x>GMhKs, fimelX I4m<>ri ',jj CAus<l tffr \s33i>t*o P 5+y/*/ 5+«+«. of Tuhs vs. Dwto swt«. -ft* W,»ien ^.J -h #<, C&xkof .fi/jptAJS $VL6*i SofRWI 31X^1 DM,cf9 -p,c e*iSZ iAJfiS a#;*j*<<) Dhl bociMbW 3> LOIS'.

JL.

THt pReavri-JtAdlitte ~fok -filing fa Mfad 4* PiSctetloM*? tfetW IS . 5/W*:y 3, 3.0(it, Hz .Mi',oiJ«* A/45 H>&+ fafiwstd /*«"/ vx-hdlc*/ p&M •*©

/efrfie/fe* u&s loot InfoMtd o4 factz&isiod of- fa Qjoud o-f tytebls jm fifflm'iM KS Qtii? L>«4U D«cc*k* H, Zeis'. 5///C1C fUf f,m A##W«C h*5 JotiAJ Me^ffiH^ -fc> $»:« fal fafiteurtrtleM 'lM fh',5 puff*, fa fyfofiXy *> #e ^,/ 5/e^e JI>M^ ?Ul 'Mfiwd fU'rfMtk fUi hi toiU U<rt /%/*eW fa J "Hot faction f.0n fcAcMloMy Rcvku), \A/mREFOfK£) HfM^Rp^^s CtvdfMtt this nrffa W^UA '&&f T***S fr*/>MTfni»JT &4 C#m'iMLJZ*ticc

CjoIqpMd city, 7o(A5 nH&z* &)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.