Raymon Steffani Lawrence v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Raymon Steffani Lawrence v. State

Opinion

Order entered June 8, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-01177-CR

No. 05-17-01178-CR

RAYMON STEFFANI LAWRENCE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-20873-U, F17-00600-U

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s June 6, 2018 third motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE

Reference

Status
Published