IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 17-1048 444444444444

OSCAR ORTIZ, PETITIONER, v.

STATE FARM LLOYDS, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, joined by JUSTICE BROWN and JUSTICE BLACKLOCK, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I join Parts I, II, III-A, III-B, and III-C of the Court’s opinion. For the reasons I explain today

in dissent from the Court’s opinion in Barbara Technologies Corp. v. State Farm Lloyds,1 I dissent

from Part III-D and from the Court’s judgment insofar as it does not affirm the court of appeals’

judgment in full.

Nathan L. Hecht Chief Justice

Opinion delivered: June 28, 2019

1 ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2019).