United States v. Private E2 COLE P. HORSMAN
Opinion
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before CONN, HOFFMAN, and GIFFORD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Private E2 COLE P. HORSMAN United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20100971 Headquarters, XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg Karin G. Tackaberry, Military Judge Colonel Stephen J. Berg, Staff Judge Advocate
For Appellant: Major Laura Kesler, JA; Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan F.
Potter, JA (on brief).
For Appellee: Pursuant to A.C.C.A. Rule 15.2, no response filed.
7 June 2011 --------------------------------- SUMMARY DISPOSITION --------------------------------- Per Curiam: A military judge sitting as a special court-martial sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for five months, forfeiture of $1,081.00 pay per month for five months, and reduction to Private E1. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged. On appeal, this court reviewed this case on its merits pursuant to Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 [hereinafter UCMJ]. In our review, we found error with respect to the adjudged forfeitures the military judge imposed.
Rule for Courts-Martial 201(f)(2)(B) [hereinafter R.C.M.] prohibits special courts-martial from adjudging forfeiture of pay exceeding two- thirds pay per month or any forfeiture of pay for more than one year. In this case, the military judge announced a sentence in excess of allowable forfeitures authorized pursuant to R.C.M. 201 (f)(2)(B)(i). See also R.C.M. 1003 (b)(2) and Article 19, UCMJ. The convening authority, in the action, subsequently approved the excessive forfeitures.
We affirm the findings of guilty. After considering the entire record, this court affirms only so much of the sentence as provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for five months, forfeiture of $964.00 pay per month for five months, and reduction to Private E1. All rights, privileges, and property, of which appellant has been deprived by virtue of that portion of his sentence set aside by this decision, are hereby ordered restored. See UCMJ Art. 75(a).
FOR THE COURT:
MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.