U S Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2013

United States v. Private First Class SHAUN M. WILLOUGHBY

United States v. Private First Class SHAUN M. WILLOUGHBY
U S Army Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided February 14, 2013
United States v. Private First Class SHAUN M. WILLOUGHBY

Opinion

UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before COOK, GALLAGHER, and BURTON Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Private First Class SHAUN M. WILLOUGHBY United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20110100 Headquarters, Fort Carson Mark A. Bridges, Military Judge Colonel Randy T. Kirkvold, Staff Judge Advocate (pretrial) Lieutenant Colonel Steven P. Haight, Staff Judge Advocate (post-trial) For Appellant: Colonel Patricia A. Ham, JA; Major Jacob D. Bashore, JA; Captain Kristin McGrory, JA (on brief).

For Appellee: Major Robert A. Rodrigues, JA; Captain Daniel H. Karna, JA (on brief).

14 February 2013 ---------------------------------- SUMMARY DISPOSITION ---------------------------------- Per Curiam: A panel of officers sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of assault in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 928 (2006) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for one year, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the grade of E-1.

The convening authority approved appellant’s request for deferment of automatic and adjudged forfeitures, as well as appellant’s reduction in rank, until action. At action, the convening authority waived appellant’s automatic forfeitures for a six-month period, with direction that they be used for the benefit of appellant’s dependent son. However, the convening authority failed to disapprove the adjudged forfeitures, leaving no pay and allowances to waive for the benefit of appellant’s son. In order to effectuate the clear intent of the convening authority, and in the interest of judicial economy, we set aside that portion of the sentence that includes forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

WILLOUGHBY—ARMY 20110100 On consideration of the entire record, and the matters personally raised by appellant pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), the findings of guilty are AFFIRMED. Only so much of the approved sentence as provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for one year, and reduction to the grade of E-1 is AFFIRMED. All rights, privileges, and property of which appellant was deprived by virtue of that portion of his sentence set aside by this decision are hereby ordered restored. See UCMJ arts. 58(b), 75(a).

FOR THE COURT: FOR THE COURT:

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. MALCOLM Clerk of Court H. SQUIRES, JR. Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.