U S Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2022

United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams
U S Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided January 10, 2022
United States v. Williams

Opinion

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32692

________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee v.

Charles R. WILLIAMS

Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 10 January 2022 ________________________

Military Judge: Mark W. Milam.

Sentence: Sentence adjudged on 28 January 2021 by SpCM convened at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Sentence entered by military judge on 17 February 2021: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 10 months, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand.

For Appellant: None. * Before JOHNSON, KEY, and MEGINLEY, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The findings and sentence as entered are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles

United States v. Williams, No. ACM S32692 59(a) and 66(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(d) (Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2019 ed.)). Accordingly, the ap- proved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court

* On 28 January 2021 and again on 22 March 2021, Appellant declined, in writing, appellate defense counsel representation. See United States v. Xu, 70 M.J. 140 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (mem.); see also Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Jus- tice, ¶ 14.5.2 (18 Jan. 2019).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.