United States v. Heilig
Opinion
U NITED S TATES A IR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS ________________________ No. ACM 40740 ________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Timothy A. HEILIG Airman (E-2), U.S. Air Force, Appellant ________________________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 8 December 2025 ________________________ Military Judge: Tyler B. Musselman.
Sentence: Sentence adjudged 23 August 2024 by GCM convened at Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina. Sentence entered by the military judge on 29 October 2024: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 5 months, and reduction to E-1.
For Appellant: Major Jordan L. Grande, USAF.
For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Jenny A. Liabenow, USAF; Major Vanessa Bairos, USAF; Major Kate E. Lee, USAF.
Before DOUGLAS, MASON, and KUBLER, Appellate Military Judges. ________________________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4 ________________________ PER CURIAM: The findings as entered are correct in law. Article 66(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866(d) (Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 ed.)). Additionally, the sentence as entered is correct in law and fact. No error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of Appel- lant occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(d), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(d) United States v. Heilig, No. ACM 40740
(Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2019 ed.)). Accordingly, the find- ings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT
CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.