United States v. Smith
United States v. Smith
70 M.J. 130; 2011 CAAF LEXIS 402
Opinion of the Court
CCA 20100646. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUS*131 SELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.