United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces, 2011

United States v. Burton

United States v. Burton
United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces · Decided September 20, 2011 · Baker
70 M.J. 353; 2011 CAAF LEXIS 823
United States v. Burton

Opinion of the Court

CCA S31682. On further consideration of the granted issues, 69 M.J. 403 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and the briefs of the parties, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issues in light of United States v. Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296 (C.A.A.F. 2011), United States v. Blazier, 69 M.J. 218 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and United States v. Blazier, 68 M.J. 439 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and to determine whether the erroneous admission of the cover memorandum and specimen custody document of the drug testing report was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Dissenting Opinion

BAKER, Judge,

joined by STUCKY, Judge (dissenting): I would affirm based on the analysis of the Court of Criminal Appeals in this case and based on my separate *354opinion in United States v. Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296, 306-13 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., joined by Stucky, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.