United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces, 2011

United States v. Sanders

United States v. Sanders
United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces · Decided September 20, 2011 · Baker
70 M.J. 354; 2011 CAAF LEXIS 818
United States v. Sanders

Opinion of the Court

CCA 201000522. On further consideration of the granted issue,_M.J_, (Daily Journal September 15, 2011), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of *355Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296 (C.A.A.F. 2011), United States v. Blazier, 69 M.J. 218 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and United States v. Blazier, 68 M.J. 439 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and to determine whether the erroneous admission of testimonial hearsay in the drug testing report was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Dissenting Opinion

BAKER, Judge

(dissenting): I would affirm based on the analysis of the Court of Criminal Appeals in this case and based on my separate opinion in United States v. Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296, 306-13 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., joined by Stucky, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.