United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces, 2011

United States v. Narula

United States v. Narula
United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces · Decided November 30, 2011 · Baker
70 M.J. 422; 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1042
United States v. Narula

Opinion of the Court

CCA 37658. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION FOR FRATERNIZATION FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT ALLEGES A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 134 BUT FAILS TO ALLEGE ANY OF ARTICLE 134’S TERMINAL ELEMENTS.

The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is vacated. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011). [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

Dissenting Opinion

BAKER, Chief Judge

(dissenting): I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Fosler. United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240-47 (C.A.A.F. 2011).

ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.