United States v. Bigback
United States v. Bigback
71 M.J. 8; 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1072
Opinion of the Court
CCA 20101044. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE ‘TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS*9 REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.