United States v. Hilou
United States v. Hilou
71 M.J. 103; 2012 CAAF LEXIS 136
Opinion of the Court
CCA 20100770. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE AS IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, ‘THE TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.