United States v. Murphy
United States v. Murphy
71 M.J. 106; 2012 CAAF LEXIS 74
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- United States v. Murphy (United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
CCA 19872873. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II AND THE SPECIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL CHARGE II FAIL TO STATE AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDING IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2001).
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
BAKER, Chief Judge (dissenting): I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Fosler. United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240-47 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.