United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces, 2012

United States v. Hathorne

United States v. Hathorne
United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces · Decided March 27, 2012
71 M.J. 200; 2012 CAAF LEXIS 358
United States v. Hathorne

Opinion of the Court

CCA 2011-02. On consideration of Appellant’s motion to exclude Appendices A, B, C and D from Appellee’s answer, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied as to Appendix A, but is granted as to Appendices B, C, and D without prejudice to Appellee’s filing a motion to supplement the record under Rule 30A, Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.