United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces, 2012

United States v. Bozeman

United States v. Bozeman
United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces · Decided April 6, 2012
71 M.J. 295; 2012 CAAF LEXIS 531
United States v. Bozeman

Opinion of the Court

CCA 20080711. Review granted on the following issue:

WHEN THE GOVERNMENT FAILS TO ALLEGE AN ARTICLE 134 TERMINAL ELEMENT, THE CHARGE FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE UNLESS THE TERMINAL ELEMENT CAN BE “NECESSARILY IMPLIED” FROM THE LANGUAGE OF THE SPECIFICATION. THE MISSING TERMINAL ELEMENT FROM THE SPECIFICATIONS OF CHARGE III CANNOT BE NECESSARILY IMPLIED FROM THE TEXT. ARE THE SPECIFICATIONS FATALLY DEFECTIVE?

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.