United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces, 2012

United States v. McNaughton

United States v. McNaughton
United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces · Decided July 10, 2012 · Baker
71 M.J. 348; 2012 CAAF LEXIS 752
United States v. McNaughton

Dissenting Opinion

*BAKER, Chief Judge

(dissenting): Consistent with my views in United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209, 217 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (Baker, C.J., dissenting), and United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., dissenting), I respectfully dissent.

Opinion of the Court

CCA 20090596. On further consideration of the granted issue, 71 M.J. 320 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (order granting review, May 23, 2012), and in view of United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209 (C.A.A.F. 2012), it is ordered that the portion of the decision of the United States *349Army Court of Criminal Appeals as to Charge II (renumbered), Specification 2 (renumbered)(alleging adultery), and as to the sentence is reversed. The decision of that court as to the remaining charges and specifications is affirmed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for further consideration in light of Humphries.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.