United States v. Redd

(dissenting): Consistent with my views in United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209, 217 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (Baker, C.J., dissenting), and United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., dissenting), I respectfully dissent.

CCA 201000682. On further consideration of the granted issue, 71 M.J. 304 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (order granting review, April 19, 2012), and in view of United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209 (C.A.A.F. 2012), it is ordered that the portion of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals as to Charge III, Specifications 1 and 2, *357and as to the sentence is reversed. The decision of that court as to the remaining charges and specifications is affirmed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for remand to that court for further consideration in light of Humphries.