United States v. Tunstall
United States v. Tunstall
71 M.J. 379; 2012 CAAF LEXIS 921
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- United States v. Tunstall (United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
CCA 37592. Review granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER APPELLANT’S CONVICTION FOR INDECENT ACTS MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN INSTRUCTING THE JURY THAT INDECENT ACTS IS A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT.
II. WHETHER THE FINDING OF GUILTY TO ADULTERY MUST BE DISMISSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE FOR COURTS-MARTIAL 907(b)(1) BECAUSE IT FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.