United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces, 2017

United States v. Claxton

United States v. Claxton
United States Court of Appeals For The Armed Forces · Decided May 4, 2017
76 M.J. 341; 2017 CAAF LEXIS 543
United States v. Claxton

Opinion of the Court

CCA 38188. On consideration of Appellant’s motion to close the courtroom for oral argument and the response of the *342government not opposing said motion, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied. All parties will refer to the second confidential informant as “CI2” if necessary to the presentation of counsel’s oral argument on the assigned issue. The Clerk is directed to seal Appellant’s reply brief.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.