MaxFour Engineers and Architects, LLC
Opinion
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) MaxF our Engineers and Architects, LLC ) ASBCA Nos. 59040, 593 71, 593 72 ) Under Contract No. W9128F-09-C-0049 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Robert W. Tate, Esq.
Napa, CA APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas J. Warren, Esq.
Acting Engineer Chief Trial Attorney James M. Pakiz, Esq.
Erin K. Murphy, Esq.
Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCNULTY It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $6,536,108.35. This amount is inclusive of interest. No further interest shall be paid.
Dated: 7 February 2018
Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals I concur
J.~ Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59040, 59371, 59372, Appeals of MaxF our Engineers and Architects, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.