Board of Immigration Appeals, 2005

R-A

Board of Immigration Appeals · Decided July 1, 2005 · ID 3504

23 I. & N. Dec. 694

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

R-A (Board of Immigration Appeals 2008)
De Pena-Paniagua v. Barr (1st Cir. 2020)
Hong Ying Gao v. Alberto Gonzales, 1 (2d Cir. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Cite as 23 I&N Dec. 694 (A.G. 2005) Interim Decision #3504

In re R-A-, Respondent

Decided by Attorney General January 19, 2005 Decided by Attorney General January 19, 20011 Decided by Board June 11, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals FOR APPLICANT: Jane B. Kroesche, Esquire, and Karen Musalo, Esquire, San Francisco, California

FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Joe D. Whitley, General Counsel

BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (January 19, 2005)

The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for reconsideration following final publication of the proposed rule published at 65 Fed. Reg. 76,588 (Dec. 7, 2000). The BIA should reconsider the decision in light of the final rule.

1 The Attorney General’s January 19, 2001, and the Board’s June 11, 1999, decisions in this case were published as Matter of R-A-, 22 I&N Dec. 906 (A.G. 2001; BIA 1999).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.