United States Board of Tax Appeals, 1925

Stockbridge v. Commissioner

Stockbridge v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals · Decided July 11, 1925 · Ivms, Morris, Ivins
2 B.T.A. 327; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2461
Stockbridge v. Commissioner

Opinion of the Court

*328OPINION.

Ivins:

We are satisfied by evidence submitted by the taxpayers-,, and uncontroverted, that depreciation should be allowed the partnership for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1919, in the amount of $29,698.73.

The item of $22,000 was not a proper deduction for the fiscal year in question. At the end of that year it represented not an accrued liability but a reserve.

During the fiscal year in question claims existed only in contemplation, not in fact. They did not arise and so accrue until after the-close of the fiscal year. Appeal of Consolidated Asphalt Co., 1 B. T. A. 79; Appeal of Henry Reubel, 1 B. T. A. 676; Appeal of Uvalde Co., 1 B. T. A. 932; Appeal of William J. Ostheimer, 1 B. T. A. 18.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.