United States Board of Tax Appeals, 1925

Appeal of Oliver Finnie Co.

Appeal of Oliver Finnie Co.
United States Board of Tax Appeals · Decided June 23, 1925 · Marquette, Morris
2 B.T.A. 134
Appeal of Oliver Finnie Co.

Opinion of the Court

*136OPINION.

Morris:

The contributions claimed by the taxpayer as deductible are not.ordinary and necessary expenses paid in carrying on the business, within the meaning of section 234 (a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1918. Appeal of Woolf & Reynolds, Inc., 1 B. T. A. 1092; Appeal of The Thomas Shoe Co., 1 B. T. A. 124.

The taxpayer admits that 2per cent is a reasonable depreciation rate on the building, but claims a composite rate of 3 per cent on “ building assets ” on a March 1,1913, value of $261,101.92. No competent evidence was introduced to sustain that value or to show their useful life. As the evidence was also insufficient as to the value and useful life of the other assets upon which additional depreciation is claimed, the values and depreciation rates used by the Commissioner must be approved.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.