Appeal of Sanford
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Arizona State Tax Commission v. Kieckhefer (Ariz. 1948)
- Vanderbilt v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1927)
- Sanford v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1925)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The taxpayer has included in his deductions items which are capital expenditures, as, for example, amounts expended in removing trees and brush from land which was not seeded to a marketable crop in the same year in which it was cleared. Such expenditures are comparable to the expenditures incident to the planting
A part of the expenditures which the taxpayer seeks to deduct are deductible as business expenses. The remainder are capital expenditures. We can not determine or even approximate a correct segregation. Had the taxpayer produced his books of account and from them testified as to the expenditures, we might have been able to make a segregation and classification, but without this evidence before us we are constrained to approve the determination of the Commissioner.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.