Romberger v. Commissioner
Opinion
*523 Before ARUNDELL and LANSDON.
The Commissioner's notice which is the basis of this appeal asserts deficiencies in income tax for the years 1919 and 1920, in the respective amounts of $6,840.12 and $5,831.92, and advises of an overassessment for the year 1921, in the amount of $216.06. The petitioners appeal only as to the year 1920, aver that the amount in controversy is $5,946.35, and contend that the Commissioner erred in disallowing a loss, in the amount of $14,926.36, sustained by Henry A. Romberger in the year 1920 in the sale of a certain residential property.
FINDINGS OF FACT.
Henry A. Romberger died May 10, 1925, at which time the tax controversy herein was pending before the Commissioner. By will, *524 duly admitted to probate, Georgiana M. Romberger and the Provident Trust Co. of Philadelphia were designated as executors of the estate of the deceased, and as such executors are the petitioners in this proceeding.
At a sheriff's sale held on January 24, 1910, Romberger purchased a residential property located at 5426 Wayne*2269 Avenue, Germantown, Philadelphia. Such property consisted of a lot improved with a twenty-room dwelling house, constructed of gray stone and a fourcar gray-stone garage, which had second floor accommodations for a chauffeur and family. At the date of such purchase he was a widowber, but, in March, 1910, he remarried. After some rather hurried repairs to the house he moved into and occupied it as his residence until some time in 1918, when he went to California. Thereafter, during Romberger's ownership, the house was occupied, rent free, by one John T. Bougher, who was a close personal friend of the owner.
The parties agree that the original purchase price of the property in question was $28,200; that during the years 1913, 1914, and 1917, Romberger made repairs, additions and improvements of a capital nature, at a cost of $24,364.62; and that he sold the property some time in 1920 for $37,500.
In his income-tax return for the year 1920, Romberger deducted the amount $14,926.36 as a loss sustained during the taxable years in a transaction entered into for profit. Upon audit of such return the Commissioner disallowed the loss, added the amount thereof to income, and asserted*2270 the deficiency which the Board is asked to redetermine.
OPINION.
LANSDON: In view of the Board's decision in the .
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.