United States Board of Tax Appeals, 1926

Bell,Rogers & Zemurray Bros. Co. v. Commissioner

Bell,Rogers & Zemurray Bros. Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals · Decided August 2, 1926 · Trammell, Iagen, Morris, Green, Sterni, Murdock
4 B.T.A. 687; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2226
Bell,Rogers & Zemurray Bros. Co. v. Commissioner

Dissenting Opinion

Sterni-iagen,

dissenting: I dissent on the authority of the Board’s decision in the Appeal of Anniston City Land Co., 2 B. T. A. 526.

Green, Morris, and Murdock concur in the dissent.

Opinion of the Court

*688OPINION.

Trammell

: The decision in this case, in so far as it relates to the contribution to the-Chamber'of Commerce, is controlled by the opinion in the Appeal of Thomas Shoe Co., 1 B. T. A. 124, and it is not necessary to repeat here what was said there. The contribution was not an ordinary and necessary expense of the taxpayer’s business.

Order of redetermination mil he ’ entered on 10 days’ notice, wider Rule SO.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.