United States Board of Tax Appeals, 1926

Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner

Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals · Decided August 2, 1926 · Sternhagen, Morris, Green, Murdoch, Tkammell
4 B.T.A. 689; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2227
Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner

Dissenting Opinion

Sternhagen,

dissenting: I dissent on the authority of the Board’s decision in the Appeal of Anniston City Land Co., 2 B. T. A. 526.

Green, Morris, and Murdoch concur in the dissent.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Tkammell

: The decision in this appeal is governed by the Appeal of Thomas Shoe Co., 1 B. T. A. 124; and Appeal of Bell-Rogers & Zemurray Brothers Co., ante, p. 687. The contribution was not an ordinary and necessary business expense.

Order of redetermination mil be entered on 10 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.