United States Board of Tax Appeals, 1926

Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Commissioner

Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals · Decided November 12, 1926 · Littleton
5 B.T.A. 479; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2853
Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Commissioner

Opinion

APPEAL OF AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY OF AMERICA.
Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 4987.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
5 B.T.A. 479; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2853;
November 12, 1926, Decided
*2853 Irving Smith, Jr., Esq., for the petitioner.
Thomas P. Dudley, Jr., Esq., for the Commissioner.

LITTLETON

*479 LITTLETON: This is an appeal from the determination of deficiencies for the years 1918 and 1919 in the amounts of $32,802.85 and $7,800.80, respectively, of which amounts approximately $2,100 is in dispute.

The controversy arises from the reduction by the Commissioner from $50,000 to $25,000 of invested capital, representing alleged value of patents and license agreements.

*480 FINDINGS OF FACT.

The taxpayer is a Delaware corporation with principal office in New York City. During the taxable years it was affiliated with the Sypho-Chemical Sprinkler Corporation. On February 6, 1916, the Sypho-Chemical Sprinkler Corporation acquired for $200,000 par value of its capital stock certain patents and license agreements covering a certain automatic fire extinguishment system, which patents and license agreements had an actual cash value at the time acquired for stock of $50,000.

Judgment will be entered for the petitioner upon the issue raised on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.