Shell Co. of California v. Commissioner
Opinion
*3910 *1324 ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS' MOTIONS
In each of the above entitled proceedings the respondent, on the sixtieth day after service on him of a copy of the petitioner, filed with the Clerk of the Board a request for an extension of time within which to answer or to move in respect of the petitions. Said requests were endorsed "Granted" by a Member of the Board on days varying from the sixty-second to the sixty-ninth day after service of copies of the petitions on the respondent, which action was taken
*3911 The matter of granting the respondent additional time in which to answer being within the discretion of the Board, as decided in , it is
ORDERED that petitioners' motions in each of these proceedings be and are hereby denied, and that proceedings be restored to the general calendar for hearing in due course.
By the Board:
(Signed) C. ROGERS ARUNDELL,
Dated March 12, 1928.
STERNHAGEN, VAN FOSSAN, and MURDOCK dissent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.