Gallum v. Commissioner
Opinion of the Court
The petition as amended in the case of the petitioner Herzog assigns the following as errors on the part of the respondent in determining the proposed deficiency: (1) In holding that the seizure by the Alien Property Custodian in August, 1918, as enemy-owned, of the shares of stock in the American Transatlantic Co. and the Foreign Transport & Mercantile Corporation standing in the name of the petitioners was not taking of such without compensation resulting in a loss or destruction in the value of the shares to the petitioner and did not constitute a deductible loss allowable
The petitions, as amended, in the cases of the other petitioners assign, in addition to the foregoing, the following as errors on the part of the respondent: (1) In holding that the transfer of the shares of stock by Wagner to the petitioners constituted a sale as contra-distinguished from a gift, and (2) in holding that the dividends paid in 1918 upon the stock of the American Transatlantic Co. and the Foreign Transport & Mercantile Corporation standing in the names of the petitioners belonged to them and not to Wagner.
The respondent denies that any error was committed in determining the proposed deficiencies.
In determining the deficiencies involved herein the respondent included in the taxable income of the respective petitioners as dividends the following amounts:
Franklin P. Mann_'-$232, 005. 94
John S. Lawson- 58,088. 44
Frederick O. Pritzlaff_ 316,176.89
Mathilda W. Berger_ 232,005.94
Walter J. Berger_ 23,536.83
Philip W. Herzog_ 116,071.44
The above amounts represent the total of the 30 per cent dividend and the two distributions of the American Transatlantic Co. and the dividend of the Foreign Transport & Mercantile Corporation.
In determining that the dividends and distributions were taxable income, the respondent held that Wagner had sold the stock to the parties whose tax liability is involved herein, with the privilege of paying for it from the dividends paid on such stock.
While much evidence was submitted to show that Wagner and not the petitioners was the owner of the stock on which the dividends and distributions involved in these proceedings were declared and made, we think that a decision as to this is not necessary to a determination of the liability of the petitioners for the proposed deficiencies.
On the other hand, if Wagner and not the petitioners was the owner of the stock, the dividends clearly would not be taxable to the petitioners.
Reviewed by the Board.
Judgment will he entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.