McManigal v. Commissioner
Opinion of the Court
In his income-tax return for the taxable year the petitioner deducted from the sales price received for his farm the amount of $1,000 representing depreciation of improvements sustained during his ownership and reported a profit of $15,100 realized from the sale. Upon audit of such return the Commissioner added the sustained and allowable depreciation to the sales price and determined a profit of $17,100. On this issue the determination of the respondent is approved. Even Realty Co., 1 B. T. A. 355; United States v. Ludey, 274 U. S. 295.
At the hearing the petitioner, on permission granted, amended his petition to include a claim for an additional deduction from his gross operating income for the taxable year of the amount of $2,500. He alleges that he borrowed such amount from banks in 1919 and expended the whole thereof in the purchase of cattle and corn; that within the year the cgrn was fed to live stock intended for sale; that the live stock purchased was either sold within the year or on hand at the close of the year; and that the said $2,500 was inadvertently omitted from the amounts claimed as deductions from operating income. The evidence on this point is not sufficiently clear to enable us to make a finding of fact favorable to the petitioner. The record shows that during the taxable year the petitioner expended $2,594.22 for feed and that at the end of such year he had live stock not sold of the value of $2,136.28. It is clear that the amount in question was borrowed as alleged, but nothing in the record proves that it
Reviewed by the Board.
Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.