Capital City State Bank v. Commissioner
Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
It appears from the evidence that at the date of the charge-off for which deduction is here claimed the petitioner held collateral taken as security for each of the notes alleged to have become worthless in the taxable year. The action of the Commissioner in disallowing the deductions claimed is approved (1) because, as to the Bristol note, under the Revenue Act of 1918 no partial charge-off of a debt alleged to be worthless is authorized, and (2) because, as to each of the notes in question, the petitioner held col
Decision will he entered for the respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.