Worumbo Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
Opinion
*3152 1. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. - Petitioner's taxable year in question was the fiscal year ending November 30, 1919. A waiver was executed by the petitioner "for the year 1919."
2. INVESTED CAPITAL. - The invested capital for the fiscal year ending November 30, 1919, should be properly adjusted on account of the prior-year tax liability in accordance with the stipulation of the parties.
*883 In this proceeding the petitioner seeks a redetermination of its income and profits-tax liability for the fiscal year ended November 30, 1919, for which the respondent, as set forth in his deficiency letter dated January 11, 1926, determined a deficiency of $38,521.66.
The petition alleges that the respondent erred (1) in failing to allow as part of invested capital an amount in excess of $400,000, representing expenditures for capital assets incurred and made prior to the taxable year; (2) in reducing invested capital by an amount of taxes for the prior*3153 year which amount has, since the mailing of the deficiency letter, been reduced by the respondent, and (3) in issuing a deficiency letter after the running of the statute of limitations. The first issue was abandoned at the hearing and with respect to the second issue, the parties have stipulated to make the proper adjustment for prior year taxes in the final determination under Rule 50.
FINDINGS OF FACT.
The petitioner was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maine in 1864, and has its principal office at Bath, Me.
On February 16, 1920, it filed on Form 1120-A, its "corporation Income and Profits Tax Return for Fiscal Period begun December 1, *884 1918 and ended November 30, 1919." On December 16, 1924, it executed the following income and profits-tax waiver:
In pursuance of the provisions of existing Internal Revenue Laws,
WORUMBO MANUFACTURING COMPANY
By (Signed) OLIVER MOSES,
(Signed) D. H. BLAIR,
The deficiency letter was mailed to the petitioner on January 11, 1926.
OPINION.
GREEN: The petitioner contends that the waiver set out in the findings of fact is not an effective waiver for the reason that it is "for the year 1919" and not for the fiscal year ended November 30, 1919. We fail to see any merit in this contention. The term "taxable*3155 year" is defined in all of the Revenue Acts beginning with the Revenue Act of 1918 as meaning "the calendar year, or the fiscal year ending during such calendar year." The term "year 1919" as used by the parties to the waiver could have referred to no other year than the taxable year 1919 which in this case was the fiscal year ended November 30, 1919. In our opinion the waiver was valid and since it had not expired at the time the deficiency letter was mailed the proposed deficiency is not barred by the statute of limitations. See section 277(b) of the Revenue Act of 1924.
The invested capital for the fiscal year ended November 30, 1919, should be adjusted by the correct amount of Federal income and profits taxes prorated for the prior year in accordance with the stipulation of the parties.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.