J. Duncan Co. v. Commissioner
Opinion of the Court
The first error assigned relates to the exclusion from invested capital of $38,921.68, the depreciated value of patterns paid in for stock. The issue is solely one of fact as to the value of such patterns on October 1, 1912. We have found as a fact that such patterns had a value on that date of $38,850. The depreciated value of such patterns should be included in invested capital for 1919..
In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, depreciation at the rate of 4 per cent should be allowed on the above value of the patterns.
The third error alleged was the understatement of invested capital by the omission of $5,000 earned surplus. The facts are that the stockholders endorsed and returned two quarterly dividend checks to the corporation for the purpose of meeting the payments on a new building. Their accounts were credited with the amounts of the dividend. We are of the opinion that such amounts constitute borrowed capital and can not, therefore, be included in invested capital. Cf. Appeal of Kelly-Buckley Co., 1 B. T. A. 1154; Appeal of Wm. H. Davidow Sons Co., 1 B. T. A. 1215.
The parties stipulated the remaining assignments of error as set out in the findings of fact. The tax should be recomputed in accordance with the foregoing decision and the stipulation.
Judgment will 5e entered on 15 days’ notice, it/nder Bule 50.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.