A. B. Humphrey Co. v. Commissioner
Opinion of the Court
The respondent contends that petitioner’s invested capital for the taxable years before us can not be satisfactorily determined and that petitioner’s tax liability must, therefore, be computed under the provisions of section 328 of the 1918 Act by comparison with taxes paid by representative corporations.
It is agreed by the parties that since the petitioner was organized after March 3, 1917, and since the interest or control of 50 per cent or more of the property conveyed to it at the time of its organization remained in the same persons, the provisions of section 331 of the Revenue Act of 1918 are applicable, limiting the value at which such property may be included in petitioner’s invested capital to the cost thereof to such persons, with a reasonable allowance for depreciation to the date of petitioner’s incorporation.
The petitioner contends that the cost of the property conveyed to it by the incorporators, less a reasonable allowance for depreciation to the date of incorporation, is capable of sufficiently definite ascertainment to satisfy the statute.
The evidence before us fairly substantiates the depreciated cost of the property to the incorporators as set out in the above findings of fact. The cost of the land comprising the Mayhews and Escalón ranches was established by the uncontradicted testimony of competent witnesses. The inventory above described was made by Humphrey and Landsborough preparatory to incorporation, and was based upon depreciated cost rather than value. The figures in the most instances were taken from the original invoices and bills. In respect of such items as live stock and other property produced upon the ranches, witnesses testified as to their cost of production and the depreciation sustained from their personal knowledge.
Judgment will be entered wider Bule 50.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.