Dutton v. Commissioner
Opinion
*2511 1. The petitioners were not considered to be taxable as a trust under the regulations in force at the time the return for 1924 was filed, or under any ruling of the Commissioner which had not been reversed or revoked. They are not, therefore, entitled to be taxed as a trust for such year under the provisions of section 704 of the Revenue Act of 1928.
2. During the taxable years the petitioners constituted an "association" taxable as a corporation within the meaning of section 2(a) of the Revenue Acts of 1924 and 1926.
*1152 The respondent has asserted deficiencies in income taxes for the years 1924, 1925, and 1926, in the respective amounts of $7,500.14, $6,370, and $5,400. The single issue raised by the pleadings is whether the petitioners constitute an "association" taxable as a corporation, or whether they are taxable as a trust.
At the hearing the parties filed a stipulation covering all the material facts, from which we make the following findings of fact.
FINDINGS OF FACT.
Prior to September 30, 1920, the*2512 Ontra Cafeteria Co., an Illinois corporation, owned and operated two cafeterias in Chicago, Ill. Its capital stock, in the total amount of $100,000, was held by three stockholders.
On September 30, 1920, the following declaration of trust was executed by Mary L. Dutton, Jane LeFurgy, and W. E. Lindblad, who are the petitioners herein:
Whereas, it is the purpose and intention that the Trustees*2513 shall purchase and thereafter manage and conduct the business heretofore conducted and carried on by Ontra Cafeteria Co., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, and any other business or transaction, such as by the Trustees may be considered advisable and as tending to enhance the value of the beneficial interests in the Trust hereby created.
ARTICLE I.
*1153 ARTICLE II.
* * *
(k) To make such by-laws, rules and regulations to govern the management of the Trust Estate as they shall deem advisable and to select one of their number to act as President, one to act as Treasurer and one to act as Secretary of this Trust, delegating to each of said officers such duties as they may, from time to time, determine.
* * *
ARTICLE IV.
ARTICLE V.
* * *
*1154 ARTICLE VI.
* * *
* * *
Section Eleven: The Trustees may from time to time, in their discretion for the purpose of increasing the Trust Estate, issue further certificates for shares of beneficial interest with such rights and priorities in the Trust Estate and upon such terms and conditions as they may determine. All such payments received and certificates issued shall be subject to this Declaration of Trust.
ARTICLE VII.
ARTICLE VIII.
ARTICLE IX.
ARTICLE X.
* * *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mary L. Dutton, Jane LeFurgy and W. E. Lindblad, parties of the first part hereto, have hereunto set their hands and seal in token of their acceptance of the Trust hereinabove mentioned, and each holder, from time to time of a certificate or certificates for shares of beneficial interest issued hereunder, assets hereto, by accepting such certificate or certificates and agrees to be bound by all the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions of this DECLARATION OF TRUST.
MARY L. DUTTON, (Seal.)
JANE LEFURGY, (Seal.)
85 - No. 6994718 - Filed for Record Nov. 16, A.D. 1920 at 11:37 A.M.
JOSEPH F. HAAS, RECORDER.
On the same day that the above instrument was executed the trustees purchased and received the entire assets of the Ontra Cafeteria Co. for a consideration of $100,000. A bill of sale of the property in favor of the above trustees*2521 was executed by Mary L. Dutton and Jane LeFurgy as president and secretary.
The Ontra Cafeteria Co. thereupon proceeded to reduce its capital stock from $100,000 to $1,000, by filing with the Secretary of State of Illinois the certificate and documents necessary to accomplish that purpose. Since that time the corporation has ceased to function as an active corporation and has so stated in all of its annual reports to the Secretary of State since that date. The capital stock of $1,000 is now held by Mary L. Dutton, Jane LeFurgy and W. E. Lindblad. The corporation is kept alive to protect the name of "Ontra Cafeteria" so that no other corporation in Illinois may use that name.
Beginning with October 1, 1920, and including the taxable years in question, the Trustees of said Ontra Cafeteria Trust have operated the business Formerly conducted by the Ontra Cafeteria Co.
The Ontra Cafeteria Trust from the time of its creation has filed fiduciary income-tax returns and the beneficiaries under the trust have included in their individual income-tax returns their distributive shares of the net income shown on the fiduciary returns and have paid the tax due thereon.
*1156 *2522 The fiduciary returns for the years 1924, 1925, and 1926, respectively, were filed with the collector of the first district of Illinois on the following dates: for 1924, on or before March 15, 1925; for 1925, on or before March 15, 1926; and for 1926, on or before March 15, 1927. Such returns disclose income for each of the years, which resulted from the operation of the cafeteria business acquired from the Ontra Cafeteria Co., as follows:
| 1924 | 1925 | 1926 | |
| Income from trade or business | $57,832.49 | $46,549.28 | $37,684.92 |
| Interest on bank deposits, notes, etc. | 3,364.34 | 2,450.72 | 2,315.08 |
| Total | 61,196.83 | 49,000.00 | 40,000.00 |
| Less interest paid | 1,195.73 | ||
| Net income | 60,001.10 | 49,000.00 | 40,000.00 |
The Supreme Court rendered its decision in the case of
The following communication was sent from the Commissioner's*2523 office to the internal revenue agent in charge at Chicago with reference to the petitioner's tax liability for the years 1920 and 1921:
WASHINGTON,
IT:CA:2442-4
In re: Ontra Cafeteria Co., Chicago, Illinois.
Reference is made to your report dated February 2, 1924, relative to an examination of the tax liability of the above named organization for the years 1920 and 1921.
You are informed that this concern has been held to be a Trust from October 1, 1920 and taxable under Section 219 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921. You are therefore requested to render a supplemental report showing separately the income for the corporation from January 1, to September 30, 1920, and the income for the Trust for the balance of the year 1920.
This matter should be given precedence over new examinations in order that the case may be closed at an early date.
(Signed) C. M. JUSTICE,
The appeal of Mary L. Dutton, Jane LeFurgy, and W. E. Lindblad, Trustees of Ontra Cafeteria, a Trust, Docket No. 20295, was closed in accordance with the following stipulation, filed on*2524 November 26, 1928:
*1157 STIPULATION
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the above-named taxpayer and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, acting by and through their respective attorneys, that there is no deficiency in tax for the year 1922 nor for the year 1923, and further, that the Board may enter an order of redetermination in accordance with the above.
OPINION.
LANSDON: The only question to be determined in this proceeding is whether the petitioners are taxable as a trust or as a corporation. The deficiencies involved herein result from the respondent's determination that the Ontra Cafeteria Trust was in fact an association taxable as a corporation in accordance with section 2(a) of the Revenue Acts of 1924 and 1926.
The petitioners contend that the Ontra Cafeteria is taxable as a trust and that in any event, since they were considered to be a "pure trust" by the Commissioner at the time the return for 1924 was made, they are entitled to the relief provided for in section 704(a) of the Revenue Act of 1928, which provides as follows:
If a taxpayer filed a return as a trust for any taxable year prior to the taxable year 1925 such taxpayer shall*2525 be taxable as a trust for such year and not as a corporation, if such taxpayer was considered to be taxable as a trust and not as a corporation either (1) under the regulations in force at the time the return was made or at the time of the termination of its existence, or (2) under any ruling of the Commissioner or any duly authorized officer of the Bureau of Internal Revenue applicable to any of such years, and interpretative of any provision of the Revenue Act of 1918, 1921, or 1924, which had not been reversed or revoked prior to the time the return was made, or under any such ruling made after the return was filed which had not been reversed or revoked prior to the time of the termination of the taxpayer's existence.
Similar questions were before the Board in
The regulations promulgated under the Revenue Act of 1924 were approved on October 6, 1924, and provide that "All rulings inconsistent *1158 herewith are hereby revoked." Article 1504 of Regulations 65 provides:
The parties have stipulated that
Holding trusts are those in which the trustees are merely holding property for the collection of the income and distributing it among the beneficiaries and are not engaged, either by themselves or in connection with the beneficiaries, in the carrying on of any business. Such trusts are not associations within the meaning of the law and are not subject to the tax.
Operating trusts are those in*2528 which the trustees are not restricted to the mere collection of funds and paying them over to the beneficiaries but are associated together in much the same manner as directors in a corporation for the purpose of, and are actually engaged in, carrying on some business enterprise. These trusts, whether of the Massachusetts type or otherwise, are to be deemed associations within the meaning of the Act,
The general rule in regard to holding trusts and operating trusts which is announced in the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of
The facts disclose that for the years 1920 and 1921 the petitioners were considered to be taxable as a trust. For the years 1922 and 1923 the petitioners filed income-tax returns as a trust, which were subsequently rejected by the Commissioner and deficiencies were asserted taxing them as an association. After an appeal to the Board had been filed and after the*2529 Revenue Act of 1928 had been approved, the parties stipulated that there were no deficiencies for the years 1922 and 1923.
We conclude that the petitioners were not considered to be taxable as a trust under the regulations in force at the time the return for *1159 1924 was made or under any ruling of the Commissioner or any duly authorized officer of the Bureau of Internal Revenue which had not been reversed or revoked prior to the filing of the return, and that they are not entitled to the relief provided for in section 704 of the Revenue Act of 1928.
The petitioners contend that the Ontra Cafeteria is a trust within the meaning of section 219 of the Revenue Acts of 1924 and 1926, and that it is taxable as such and not as a corporation. This Board and the courts have passed upon similar questions on numerous occasions and it has uniformly been held where the trustees, through corporate or association forms, are engaged in carrying on a business and are not merely holding property for the collection and distribution of income therefrom that they constitute an association taxable as a corporation, irrespective of the control exercised by the beneficiaries. *2530
The petitioners, as trustees, are engaged in carrying on a business in much the same manner as directors of a corporation, and, upon authority of the above cases, which we think are controlling here, the determination of the respondent that they are taxable as a corporation is approved.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.